Representational Efficacy and Error Dynamics in Observational Drawing
A Quantitative Method for Drawing Accuracy Evaluation
This paper presents a quantitative method for assessing observational drawing accuracy, as a more objective alternative to evaluation by expert panels. The method, design process and testing revealed insights about representational efficacy and error dynamics which may inform teaching and research. The method was used to assess and compare the efficacy level of apprentices drawing the same subject. It involves disassembling shape into partial aspects – using four graphic properties - that influence the overall representational efficacy, and comparison to photographs taken from the draughtsman’s viewpoint. This process has proven useful to: a) distinguish which parts of the drawing are accurate; b) specify the formal aspects that compromise representational accuracy, and to what extent, and; c) identify and quantify types of error. The research extends existing methods and is comprehensive in detecting 2D representational errors. The findings also suggest that certain kinds of error can give rise to others, based on some kind of “logic of compensation” process that might happen unconsciously during the task. This deserves further research.
Article copyright is maintained by the authors(s). All articles are published with Open Access (OA). TRACEY supports the OA principles and serves authors, researchers and the community by publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed OA content. By default we publish Gold OA under the CC-BY, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. We also support Green OA allowing authors to deposit content in institutional and subject-specific repositories.