Complexity in Design-Driven Innovation: A case study of knowledge transfer flow in subsea seismic sensor technology and design education
Main Article Content
Abstract
To the extent previously claimed, concept exploration is
not the key to product innovation. However, companies
that are design-focused are twice as innovative as those
that are not. To study design-driven innovation and its
occurrence in design education, two case studies are
conducted. The first is an example of design practice
which includes observation and cooperation process maps
in an offshore project. The second is an example of
product design education which includes observations of
teamwork, team member interviews and archival studies.
While the first case study demonstrates how a company
innovates through a design-driven process with complex
knowledge transference and systematic planning and
improvisation, the second case study shows students
managing their design processes through concept
generation in a less complex trial and error process.
Knowledge exploration as a part of design activity was
analyzed through the criteria of network paradoxes. A
pedagogic concept has been synthesized and validated
internally based on the case study, and externally based
on other design practices and design research. The
pedagogic concept synthesized was Knowledge Transfer
Flow [KTF]. The KTF concept can help to orient design
students within the information-saturated design
processes integrated within complex innovation systems.
not the key to product innovation. However, companies
that are design-focused are twice as innovative as those
that are not. To study design-driven innovation and its
occurrence in design education, two case studies are
conducted. The first is an example of design practice
which includes observation and cooperation process maps
in an offshore project. The second is an example of
product design education which includes observations of
teamwork, team member interviews and archival studies.
While the first case study demonstrates how a company
innovates through a design-driven process with complex
knowledge transference and systematic planning and
improvisation, the second case study shows students
managing their design processes through concept
generation in a less complex trial and error process.
Knowledge exploration as a part of design activity was
analyzed through the criteria of network paradoxes. A
pedagogic concept has been synthesized and validated
internally based on the case study, and externally based
on other design practices and design research. The
pedagogic concept synthesized was Knowledge Transfer
Flow [KTF]. The KTF concept can help to orient design
students within the information-saturated design
processes integrated within complex innovation systems.
Article Details
How to Cite
PAVEL, Nenad; BERG, Arild.
Complexity in Design-Driven Innovation: A case study of knowledge transfer flow in subsea seismic sensor technology and design education.
Design and Technology Education: an International Journal, [S.l.], v. 20, n. 1, feb. 2015.
ISSN 1360-1431.
Available at: <https://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/DATE/article/view/2022>. Date accessed: 25 mar. 2023.
Keywords
knowledge transfer flow; design thinking; network paradoxes; professional practice in design education
Issue
Section
Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.